Hi Emmanuel, On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 15:18 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > That's interesting. It looks like SBT is built with Scala 2.10 but > could be compiled with Scala 2.11: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23282469/does-sbt-build-against-scala-2-11 > > If we rebuild SBT with Scala 2.11 I guess we'll have compatibility > problems with the plugins. This would mean our sbt package would be > fine as a tool to build other packages, but it would be useless > (or quite limited) as a build tool for an end user downloading plugins > from the net. I didn't manage to read that page in this way, but OK. As long as at least someone understands it, it's good. > So it looks like we'll need a scala-2.10 package as long as SBT > is unable to run with Scala 2.11. How do we go about this? Is a new source package needed? I guess so. Hopefully it won't be hard, especially given that Scala 2.10.5 used to be available at one point: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/scala/2.10.5-1/ Let me know how to proceed and I'll start on packaging Scala 2.10.6, which SBT depends on. Cheers, Marko
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part