[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: javacsv

On Wed Dec 15 21:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> I admit being pedantic here; but there is potentially still an issue
> >> here (two actually). If upstream were to take code from the packaging,
> >> they would still have to bump their LGPL-2.1 to LGPL-3, since the
> >> packaging is LGPL-3. Also the packaging license does not have the "or
> >> any later" so upstream or anyone deriving from it would be unable to
> >> switch to a LGPL-4 (if such a license is ever created).
> >>
> >> If this is what you intended, then that is fine. I just want to be sure
> >> that you are aware of the consequence here.
> >>
> > 
> > Pedantry is fine! I've updated the package in both svn and on mentors to
> > use LGPL-2.1 or later.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Andy
> > 
> Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.
> Note I altered the wording in d/copyright - I figured it was not worth
> another email exchange. :)

Sorry to be late to the party, but is this any different to libcsv-java, which
I've already packaged?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: