On Wed Dec 15 21:53, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> I admit being pedantic here; but there is potentially still an issue > >> here (two actually). If upstream were to take code from the packaging, > >> they would still have to bump their LGPL-2.1 to LGPL-3, since the > >> packaging is LGPL-3. Also the packaging license does not have the "or > >> any later" so upstream or anyone deriving from it would be unable to > >> switch to a LGPL-4 (if such a license is ever created). > >> > >> If this is what you intended, then that is fine. I just want to be sure > >> that you are aware of the consequence here. > >> > > > > Pedantry is fine! I've updated the package in both svn and on mentors to > > use LGPL-2.1 or later. > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > > > Uploaded, thanks for your contribution. > > Note I altered the wording in d/copyright - I figured it was not worth > another email exchange. :) Sorry to be late to the party, but is this any different to libcsv-java, which I've already packaged? Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature