Re: RFS: javacsv
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2010-12-15 19:37, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On 15/12/10 14:18, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2010-12-14 21:08, Andrew Ross wrote:
>>> I had no reason to use GPL-3 for packaging, so I've changed it to
>>> LGPL-3. I've also updated the copyright file to mention "LGPL-2.1 or any
>> I admit being pedantic here; but there is potentially still an issue
>> here (two actually). If upstream were to take code from the packaging,
>> they would still have to bump their LGPL-2.1 to LGPL-3, since the
>> packaging is LGPL-3. Also the packaging license does not have the "or
>> any later" so upstream or anyone deriving from it would be unable to
>> switch to a LGPL-4 (if such a license is ever created).
>> If this is what you intended, then that is fine. I just want to be sure
>> that you are aware of the consequence here.
> Pedantry is fine! I've updated the package in both svn and on mentors to
> use LGPL-2.1 or later.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.
Note I altered the wording in d/copyright - I figured it was not worth
another email exchange. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----