On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 04:08:14PM -0500, Eric Cunningham wrote: > > Reverse DNS gives a lot more credibility to your domain as it requires > > the intentional participation of the netblock owner (or the ISP the IP > > is allocated to). If you still have the default xxx.xxx.adsl.myisp.com > > reverse in there, that says to the world you're no different then the > > infected Windows user down the street. Go through the effort to > > legitimize your server and you'll get your mail through. In most > > circumstances an ISP won't give you a reverse DNS on a dynamic IP. > > I am pursuing this line as well... This particular ISP won't set rDNS > to correspond to a dyndns.org domain, but if I purchase my own > "official" domain and show them the RIPE records they will set rDNS. > So I'm currently looking into getting a pukka domain through an agency > which will proxy the contact information (so as not to blurge my > postal address all over the WWW) without charging a fortune for it. > There are a vast number of possible domain name registration agencies, > so the research isn't exactly speedy :-) > Well, if you're after a .uk and you're an individual, you can opt out of having your address details displayed in whois. Neil ps: I've got my own tag, shout if you want a domain. -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature