On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:23:34PM +0300, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: > > > and your ISP complies with all the other rules > > > that SORBS likes to enforce then you could possibly get this > > > decision reversed. > > The rules are ridiculous and arbitrary. > > They are arbitrary, but they catch spam very well and there are practically > no false positives (not counting people who really should be using > smarthosts). > I object to the "practically no false positives (not counting people who really should be using smarthosts)". I run a mailserver, which has a static allocation. Reverse DNS matches forward DNS. However, TTL was lowered on the records so we could move various servers to a new range. We then found that the entire /24 was blocked as being 'dynamic', despite the range being clearly PI space. Should I be using a smart host in this instance? Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature