> Done. > However, Bart Cornelis should have access too (not sure if he already has > an account). Is that supported (allowing more that one person to admin a > project)? It is supported, yes. However, Bart doesn't have an account yet. I gave "fjp" all rights to the debconf, di, sid and test projects. (the pootle project is actually here only because Pootle itself is not translated otherwise, which is a bug known by the Pootle team) > The same goes for "my" program and debconf translations though. I would > accept other active members of the dutch l10n team being able to modify > them, but not any random pootle user. Yeah, all this is configurable. The current problem I have is that default permissions are not strict enough and allow any random registered user to get the "translate" right. I need to figure out where are defaults.... There's also a request from some Pootle users to have the possibility to set permissions for a whole project instead of being forced to go to any project/language combination to set permissions. But I still have to read more doc about permissions. > > > I feel that at the very least translators should be able to lock down > > > any (individual) or all translations for their language before any > > > editing is allowed that could end up in uploads of packages. > > > > This is partially possible, I think, with the permissions management > > system. > > OK. > > A final question. Is there any logging of who modified which files through > pootle? I'm not completely sure but I would say "no" and, of course, that would be an interesting option to have (I don't remember anyone mentioning this to Javier/Friedel at the Extremadura meeting). --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature