[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Small package or big dependencies?



Hi Joachim.

Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Ago 03 09:10:05 -0300 2010:
(...)
> Am Dienstag, den 03.08.2010, 09:45 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> > Il 02/08/2010 22:16, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva ha scritto:
> > > If gitit demands the exact version of libhgc6-filestore-data, this would not
> > > happen.  Or maybe some versioning constraint that is garanteed to work with the
> > > version of filestore that was used to build gitit.  For me, it seems that this
> > > is the most general solution, and I'd go with it.
> > 
> > Given that this solution (-data package with strict dependencies) seems
> > to be the only one without possible break scenarios, I'll implement
> > that. Of course, if better ideas will come up, I'll change the
> > implementation.
(...)
> The problem is that such a dependency will have to be added to gitit, so
> debian/rules of gitit will have to figure out the correct version, and
> install it into the Depends line via a substvars.

I think this kind of dependency constraints should ideally be specified in the
.cabal file, so that the debian maintainer will only need to add them to
debian/control.  I don't think we should strict to the exact version of the
library package that was used to make the build.  Sometimes upstream developers
may break things, but that should not be the usual scenario.

Greetings.
(...)
-- 
marcot
http://wiki.debian.org/MarcoSilva

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: