[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: haskell-debian vs. newest HaXml


Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 12:20 +0300 schrieb Antti-Juhani
> > As such, I think the solution to this issue is to do a package named
> HaXml1.13
> > and keep the HaXml package tracking the latest Hackage version.
> I'd recommend against that.  There's no reason to continue breaking
> existing
> packages.  The 1.19 version should be called haxml-devel, following
> upstream's
> lead.

if it turns out that HaXml-1.19 is indeed a development version and not
needed by anything in Debian, I’d suggest to just switch back to 1.13
(using an epoch version) and not package -1.19 until there is a good
reason to do so, to reduce the amount of packages we have.


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: