On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:31:11PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 13:23 -0500 schrieb John Goerzen: > > I have no problem with offering the unstable HaXml in Debian, but only > > if the stable HaXml is still here! Agreed. > Anyways, it’s there now. How bad is the impact? Should we rollback the > haxml version? Or can we live with it? I'd recommend rolling back the package and repackaging the unstable version under a different name. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature