Re: Do we need fldigi?
* Joop Stakenborg <pg4i@xs4all.nl> [2007 Feb 23 12:03 -0600]:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:19:47 -0800
> Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > A new version of fldigi (1.30) came out today. I just grabbed it and
> > will give it a try.
> >
>
>
> Harv didn't like the feel of fldigi compared to gmfsk.
> What's your experience?
To be honest. I much prefer the UI of gmfsk to fldigi. I think that
fldigi is right now technically superior. I have run up against some
UI bugs in 1.23 which may have been worked on in 1.30.
Other than a bit of a horrid color scheme that doesn't blend with my
KDE schema, and the lack of keystroke accelerators as those in gmfsk, I
find fldigi to be a fine program.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
Reply to: