Re: Do we need fldigi?

To: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Cc: debian-hams@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do we need fldigi?
From: Joop Stakenborg <pg4i@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:01:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070223190159.669678e0.pg4i@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] D8CDE818-B6BE-4049-827C-656AB8E29211@oz.net>
References: <[🔎] 14452.192.42.124.90.1172128819.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <[🔎] 20070222122624.GA7077@mail.networksplus.net> <[🔎] 20070222124924.GA9362@cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 22826.192.42.124.90.1172154018.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <[🔎] 1B8C26EF-2DC0-40DF-82BC-80D904689E6F@oz.net> <[🔎] 20070222185255.093c01bf.pg4i@xs4all.nl> <[🔎] D8CDE818-B6BE-4049-827C-656AB8E29211@oz.net>

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:19:47 -0800
Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net> wrote:

> 
> A new version of fldigi (1.30) came out today.  I just grabbed it and  
> will give it a try.
> 


Harv didn't like the feel of fldigi compared to gmfsk.
What's your experience?

> Bob, N7XY
> 


Thanks,
Joop PG4I

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>

References:
- Do we need fldigi?
  - From: "Joop Stakenborg" <pg4i@xs4all.nl>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: "Joop Stakenborg" <pg4i@xs4all.nl>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Joop Stakenborg <pg4i@xs4all.nl>
- Re: Do we need fldigi?
  - From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Do we need fldigi?
Next by Date: Re: Do we need fldigi?
Previous by thread: Re: Do we need fldigi?
Next by thread: Re: Do we need fldigi?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread