Re: Another 2.6 upgrade

To: Luis M <lemsx1@latinomixed.com>, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Another 2.6 upgrade
From: Karl Bowden <kbowden@pacificspeed.com.au>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:04:45 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 4081F04D.4090006@pacificspeed.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1082224303.2919.5.camel@tuxy>
References: <[🔎] 1082164260.4191.11.camel@tuxy> <[🔎] 4080A2E2.8090405@pacificspeed.com.au> <[🔎] 1082224303.2919.5.camel@tuxy>

Found it. I had pinned up testing in /etc/apt/preferences
Just renamed that file while upgrading, then put it back and all is well.

Did you put "unstable" in your sources.list file? Remember that
"experimental" is not a self contained repository and it depends on
"unstable" for all packages missing from it.

Assuming you did that, then what do you have in /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::DefaultRelease ? If you have something there, remove it for the
moment until you do the upgrade/install.

Thanks,
Karl.

Reply to:

References:
- Another 2.6 upgrade
  - From: Luis M <lemsx1@latinomixed.com>
- Re: Another 2.6 upgrade
  - From: Karl Bowden <kbowden@pacificspeed.com.au>
- Re: Another 2.6 upgrade
  - From: Luis M <lemsx1@latinomixed.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Next by Date: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Previous by thread: Re: Another 2.6 upgrade
Next by thread: Gedit not upgraded on upgrade to 2.6 (and other minor problems)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread