[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?



On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:21:41PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > I fail to see why you would go against the will of every developer
> > (debian and upstream) on this list.
> 
> Read my previous e-mail *sawfish 1 is exacltly the same as sawfis 2*
> 
> Then we don't need to maintains 2 sawfish packages.

Except that sawfish2 depends on 30 megs of packages ans sawfish1 didn't.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>         <-- That boy needs therapy
 
* wichert_ imagines master without a MTA
<james> wichert: ehm?  that might hinder peformance of the BTS :p

Attachment: pgpxDJOrcbMWT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: