On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 18:34, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:16:53AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > > On 19-Jun-02, 17:54 (CDT), Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 18:29, Steve Greenland wrote: > > > > This is probably going to sound a harsh, but as a user of GNOME, and > > > > assuming that the idea is to release (woody+1) with GNOME 2.x and not > > > > GNOME 1.x, > > It's not clear to me that this will be the case. It might well be > that woody+1 releases with both GNOME environments available, no? If woody+1 is to come out next year, then we'll certainly be able to ditch gnome 1.x. Gimp, Evolution, Galeon, abiword, etc. should all be Gnome2 based by that time. We are already very much discouraging any gtk+1.2 development, because it doesn't make sense. Cheers -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part