Re: Sawfish2: '2' Suffix
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 10:19:04PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> we really should have a real GNOME-2 transition plan.
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:28:33PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > May be sawfish2 will be moved in unstable with the sawfish name.
>
> What should we do? Will we upload packages with the 2 suffix to
> unstable or will we not? At the moment I think that we will have a
> long GNOME-1.4 -> GNOME-2 transition phase. So we should at least
> consider to have sawfish and sawfish2 in unstable simultaneously.
>
> Advantage: the user can choose at which point he switches to
> GNOME-2.
>
> Disadvantage: we have to solve the problems which I indicated
> in the thread titled "GNOME-2 transition plan".
>
> What do you think?
I certainly agree that we should aim for a long transition,
supporting GNOME 1.4 for the forseeable future. I don't
want to switch to GNOME 2 until I'm ready ;-)
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: