Hello Christian,
we really should have a real GNOME-2 transition plan.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:28:33PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> May be sawfish2 will be moved in unstable with the sawfish name.
What should we do? Will we upload packages with the 2 suffix to
unstable or will we not? At the moment I think that we will have a
long GNOME-1.4 -> GNOME-2 transition phase. So we should at least
consider to have sawfish and sawfish2 in unstable simultaneously.
Advantage: the user can choose at which point he switches to
GNOME-2.
Disadvantage: we have to solve the problems which I indicated
in the thread titled "GNOME-2 transition plan".
What do you think?
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
Attachment:
pgpu8GSFThM2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature