Hallo, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:21:37AM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > I think the proposal from Steve is quite sensible, and I encourage him to go > ahead. As I understand it, this would also ease the transition of the (much > needed) new mapserver package. > All the best. I fully agree. > pc > > At 21:56, giovedì 06 ottobre 2005, Steve Halasz has probably written: > > > > > > > > unixodbc is holding up gdal building again. I looked at the gdal > > > > package and it appears it is not even building with odbc support. I'd > > > > like to upload a gdal-1.2.6 that doesn't depend on unixodbc and > > > > unixodbc-dev in the control file. Have we agreed on how gdal will be > > > > maintained? Will it be team maintained by DebianGIS? Hm, I sent an email a few days ago with a proposition how to proceed with maintainership to Pkg-grass-devel. Since I have been on a fair I didn't realize that it was waiting for approval, probably because I did use the wrong email adresse. You find the original email attached to this one. Many greetings, Silke -- Intevation GmbH Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabrück, Germany http://intevation.de http://intevation.de/~silke FreeGIS.org http://freegis.org/
From Silke.Reimer@intevation.de Wed Oct 5 10:43:47 2005 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:43:47 +0200 From: Silke Reimer <Silke.Reimer@intevation.de> To: pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Maintainership of gdal in debian Message-ID: <20051005084347.GA21530@intevation.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Status: RO Content-Length: 1942 Lines: 58 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hallo! First of all I am sorry that I havn't react to all gdal relevant emails for a long time. I had contact off-list to a few of you about 2 weeks ago and wanted to send an email to this list with a proposition how to proceed with the maintainership of gdal in debian. Due to several constraints (preparing a fair, problems with our mailserver, illness) I couldn't write this email in meantime. As you surely have realized I have very limited time to maintain the gdal package in a way that is sufficient for the demands - especially since gdal is a very important package. Therefore I would like to propose a maintainership for gdal as this has been done for grass: officially debianGIS is the maintainer and there are several co-maintainers who prepare the different packages. In my opinion Claudio would be a good choice to co-maintain the package - but it would be great if there are even more volunteers and I am open for any other suggestions. What do you think? And what would I have to do to change the maintainer field if we decide to have gdal maintained by debianGIS? Many greetings, Silke BTW: I am currently on a GIS fair where we have an own booth. I still can read emails but it can take a few hours to read or to write emails. It took me 1 hour to write this short email.=20 --=20 Intevation GmbH Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabr=FCck, Germany http://intevation.de http://intevation.de/~silke FreeGIS.org http://freegis.org/ --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQ5JD1W4oD4nfjasRAtofAJ4goBfFKDFH061oprVXOOPYRRHNHwCcDXq8 TyLPqMReySC7uanWbxCvcYY= =fGRm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature