[DebianGIS] building gdal-1.3.1 packages
I have some time I can devote to building the
gdal-1.3.1 packages.
So far All patches from gdal_1.2.6-1.diff.gz applied
cleanly to clean gdal-1.3.1 sources.
When I run "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -b" I
get:
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies:
postgresql-dev postgresql-client
This brings up an interesting question... these
packages are now postgresql version specific. What is
the best way to deal with the new multi-posgresql in
terms of the gdal package? Do I need to make two
gdals, one for postgres-7.4 and another for
postgres-8.0?
New to packaging and I could use the opinion of some
experts.
Thanks list
jon
--- Silke Reimer <Silke.Reimer@intevation.de> wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:21:37AM +0200, Paolo
> Cavallini wrote:
> > I think the proposal from Steve is quite sensible,
> and I encourage him to go
> > ahead. As I understand it, this would also ease
> the transition of the (much
> > needed) new mapserver package.
> > All the best.
>
> I fully agree.
>
> > pc
> >
> > At 21:56, gioved� 06 ottobre 2005, Steve Halasz
> has probably written:
> > > > >
> > > > > unixodbc is holding up gdal building again.
> I looked at the gdal
> > > > > package and it appears it is not even
> building with odbc support. I'd
> > > > > like to upload a gdal-1.2.6 that doesn't
> depend on unixodbc and
> > > > > unixodbc-dev in the control file. Have we
> agreed on how gdal will be
> > > > > maintained? Will it be team maintained by
> DebianGIS?
>
> Hm, I sent an email a few days ago with a
> proposition how to proceed
> with maintainership to Pkg-grass-devel. Since I have
> been on a fair
> I didn't realize that it was waiting for approval,
> probably because
> I did use the wrong email adresse. You find the
> original email
> attached to this one.
>
> Many greetings,
>
> Silke
>
> --
> Intevation GmbH
>
> Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabr�ck,
> Germany
> http://intevation.de
> http://intevation.de/~silke
> FreeGIS.org
> http://freegis.org/
> > From Silke.Reimer@intevation.de Wed Oct 5
10:43:47
> 2005
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:43:47 +0200
> From: Silke Reimer <Silke.Reimer@intevation.de>
> To: pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Maintainership of gdal in debian
> Message-ID: <20051005084347.GA21530@intevation.de>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature";
> boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY"
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 1942
> Lines: 58
>
>
> --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Hallo!
>
> First of all I am sorry that I havn't react to all
> gdal relevant
> emails for a long time. I had contact off-list to a
> few of you about
> 2 weeks ago and wanted to send an email to this list
> with a
> proposition how to proceed with the maintainership
> of gdal in
> debian. Due to several constraints (preparing a
> fair, problems with
> our mailserver, illness) I couldn't write this email
> in meantime.
>
> As you surely have realized I have very limited time
> to maintain the
> gdal package in a way that is sufficient for the
> demands -
> especially since gdal is a very important package.
> Therefore I would
> like to propose a maintainership for gdal as this
> has been done for
> grass: officially debianGIS is the maintainer and
> there are several
> co-maintainers who prepare the different packages.
>
> In my opinion Claudio would be a good choice to
> co-maintain the
> package - but it would be great if there are even
> more volunteers
> and I am open for any other suggestions.
>
> What do you think? And what would I have to do to
> change the
> maintainer field if we decide to have gdal
> maintained by debianGIS?
>
> Many greetings,
>
> Silke
>
> BTW: I am currently on a GIS fair where we have an
> own booth. I
> still can read emails but it can take a few hours to
> read or to
> write emails. It took me 1 hour to write this short
> email.=20
>
> --=20
> Intevation GmbH
>
> Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabr=FCck,
> Germany
> http://intevation.de
> http://intevation.de/~silke
> FreeGIS.org
> http://freegis.org/
>
> --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
>
iD8DBQFDQ5JD1W4oD4nfjasRAtofAJ4goBfFKDFH061oprVXOOPYRRHNHwCcDXq8
> TyLPqMReySC7uanWbxCvcYY=
> =fGRm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
>
> > _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: