Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 08:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the
> > gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious enough to make it reverted.
> > Name the problematic bugs then, please. And, where is the big problem,
> > please explain?
> You mean something like
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7;email@example.com ?
Looks like the list of bugs for gcc-4.7 is quickly diminishing. Most
remaining have patches or are pending upload. Looks like most problems
was missing inclusion of <unistd.h> or some symbols no longer visible.