Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On 13.05.2012 21:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> > This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an alternative,
>>> > just that it is highly problematic as the default at this point of the release
>>> > cycle. +1 on the revert from me, sadly.
>>> in summary, these are getting addressed faster than these are submitted. Please
>>> lets wait until the end of June if to make this decision or not.
>> Hell no. End of June is when we'll be frozen. Not when we'll keep
>> messing around with big toolchain changes.
> Ack. June's been announced as the freeze target since, well, June.
sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.