Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Svante,
>
> am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
> > > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
> > > to NMU?
> > Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler for wheezy. Right now it is
> > gcc-4.7, and problems will be resolved in due time for the release.
>
> sorry to annoy you but nagging about problems of the upcoming release is
> actually our job description. So no, we won't stop just because you're telling
> us to, just with solid reasons instead of handwaving about it all going away
> because you say so. It's a hell lot of work it's causing. Nobody's saying
> anything against having gcc-4.7 as an option.
Philipp,
With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the
gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious enough to make it reverted.
Name the problematic bugs then, please. And, where is the big problem,
please explain?
Reply to: