[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

On 14.05.2012 09:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through
the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones.

There were again some more in the last couple days. They should be tagged

I am only aware of these usertags:
debian-qa@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508
do you known about a new rebuild?

From a trivial look the set from #672397 onwards on the usertagged bug list were
all filed in the past three days.

looking at 98 and 99 this doesn't seem to be a "set".

They're a "set" in that they appear after each other on the usertagged bug list. I didn't say they had sequential bug numbers, but possibly could have chosen a better description.



Reply to: