Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On 14.05.2012 09:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went
There were again some more in the last couple days. They should
the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones.
I am only aware of these usertags:
email@example.com / qa-ftbfs-20120508
do you known about a new rebuild?
From a trivial look the set from #672397 onwards on the usertagged
bug list were
all filed in the past three days.
looking at 98 and 99 this doesn't seem to be a "set".
They're a "set" in that they appear after each other on the usertagged
bug list. I didn't say they had sequential bug numbers, but possibly
could have chosen a better description.