Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On 13.05.2012 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through
>>>> the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones.
>>> There were again some more in the last couple days. They should be tagged
>> I am only aware of these usertags:
>> email@example.com / qa-ftbfs-20120508
>> do you known about a new rebuild?
> From a trivial look the set from #672397 onwards on the usertagged bug list were
> all filed in the past three days.
looking at 98 and 99 this doesn't seem to be a "set". 97 needs a fix in boost,
but can be worked around by merkatoor building with -fpermissive.