Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On 07.05.2012 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau <firstname.lastname@example.org> (07/05/2012):
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low . * Default to GCC 4.7 for
>>> gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and
>> Please revert this change. There are still too many open bugs on
> Seconded. Furthermore, doing so without an ACK from the release team isn't
> very nice. Too many transitions going on/to do already, we don't need that
> kind of fun. Why do we need to take that extra blast?
see my email to -release. It's ahead of the freeze, and the fix rate for the
build failures shows that all these issues can be fixed even before the
freeze. It is not a transition which requires binNMU's itself (except for the
libobjc stuff), and shouldn't affect other ongoing transitions. If there are
fixes needed for an ongoing transition, please bring these to my attention.