Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?
Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Robert Edmonds <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I would guess that the vast majority of folks still using sysvinit with
> > Debian are running wheezy or older, and thus removing sysvinit scripts
> > from packages in unstable wouldn't affect them. But maybe that still
> > leaves a reasonable number of testing/unstable + sysvinit users.
> Considering the past conflicts on the topic of systemd, it should be
> expected that there is a considerable user base that is staying with
> sysvinit or another alternative.
Why should it be expected? Is email activity on a given topic more or
less representative than popcon statistics?