On 2015-05-03 18:32:03, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Thanks for your prompt answer, Iustin, > > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > So: > > > > - we could have the current patch tracker resurrected easily as a stop > > gap measure; not sure what the policies are around debian.org > > services, but from the point of view of just the patch tracker, > > probably about one weekend effort; or: > > This, absolutely. > > I just wanted to mention that something related to patch tracker is > brewing around Debsources, especially for those that might be planning > significant refactoring on the patch-tracker.d.o code base. Ah, understood, very good point. I'm happy that this won't be a long-term project, especially if it's going to be replaced by a better/cleaner/more modern code base. > But GSoC > outcomes are hardly unpredictable, so I'm not ready to commit to the > availability of something by the end of the summer. Ack. > If it is easy to resurrect patch-tracker.d.o as is, and you're willing > to work on it, by all means go for it. OK, I'll proceed then. thanks! iustin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature