hi matthias, On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:35:20PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > [...] > first place. Having ten processes responsible for bits&pieces of what > systemd-as-PID1 does instead of one isn't a benefit -- not if all you gain > by that is nine additional processes. > > "It's a big monolithic thing, and big monolithic things are bad and evil > and non-Unix-y, so there!!1!" is not a valid argument. but that's the thing, to some (e.g. me) ten separate processes that each do a fairly small thing with understandable interfaces between them is an *enormous* benefit over one bigger thing that does all that in an integrated fashion. to the point that even if the one big thing would have nice,additional features, I would still opt for the decomposed one. obviously you have a different opinion and that is your good right, but you have to accept that for a lot of people this *is* important. that's why having the choice would be great! regards robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature