Re: systemd, again
Most people who are not OK with systemd have better things to than try to persuade debian-devel that the debian prject's
transition to it is problematic, and at more than just the implementation level.
See how much fun it is to belittle? See how good it feels?
More important than numbers is content. The objections being raised seem diverse, dire and cogent, while the defenses seem to
be mere vague reassurances expressed in tones just as dismissive as yours was just there.
Peter Rooney
On 06/09/14 07:00 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> That doesn't change the fact that most people who are OK with systemd have,
> to put it mildly, better things to do these days than to participate in yet
> another "discussion" about how evil, overbearing, non-Unix-way-ish, buggy,
> or being-driven-by-a-principal-author-who-is-a-*censored* systemd is.
>
Reply to: