On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:20:45PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >That this is not particularly useful is not specific to any init > > >implementation. I hate 'ENABLED=' configuration options with a passion. > > >They do not make *any* sense, even init.d has a documented (and what's > > They do in packages that ships daemons and client tools. saslauthd, > > smartd or hddtemp are examples for such useful flags. > There is no excuse for them, any time. It *is* possible (and legal) to > install an init script that does not start by default, and does not > start from postinst. I would be glad if all services (at least network-enabled or especially insecure for other reasons) didn't start by default. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature