Le mercredi 31 mars 2010 à 08:18 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > I agree. dpkg-dev should not be depending on any VCS and it should not > > promote any particular VCS either. I know that git is the new black (oh, > > wait, that was something else), but I personally don't like it. And I > > especially dislike how so many git lovers are trying to push it onto > > others, while there are perfectly good reason (not applicable to all > > teams or projects of course) not to use git but some other VCS (be it > > distributed or not. > > It was an example. I have never said that dpkg-dev would support only one > VCS. Supporting several ones would be even worse. What’s the point in standardizing over a common and flexible package format if it cannot be used with all other tools? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part