Re: Possible DDPOMail improvements?
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/02/10 at 20:20 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > On 15/02/10 at 00:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > I "accept" the mails by deleting them unread. I know where the PTS
> > > > is, I don't need to receive periodic mail reminders for my bugs,
> > > > duplicated for each team mailing list I'm subscribed to.
> > […]
> > > You are aware that you can unsubscribe, right?
> > >
> > > Anyway, I added email@example.com to the list of emails who have
> > > unsubscribed.
> > That doesn't address what Steve is complaining of, above: the messages
> > go to mailing lists to which he's subscribed. (Unless I misunderstand
> > what you're saying.)
> > Presumably unsubscribing from those mailing lists is not an option Steve
> > wants to take, since the subscription is part of the responsibility of
> > being in each team.
> Well, if he really cares about that, he could raise the point inside
> each of the team he participates in. Or just procmail the mail to
> /dev/null (the mail provides the standardized X-Debian header to make
> that easy). Or follow up on Stefano's offer to organize a poll.
> Given that, so far, the positive feedback was higher than the negative
> feedback, I'm not going to change the process without a clear sign that
> a majority of people do not want those mails.
Actually, the people who do want thos mails would like you to change the
process such that it is automatic instead of being manually run ;)