Re: Possible DDPOMail improvements?
On 15/02/10 at 00:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:06:16AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we
> > > add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security
> > > issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to
> > > increase the signal/noise ratio), for example by not reporting about
> > > Lintian errors and warnings?
>
> > I remember the early days of DDPO-by-mail and the related fear of
> > getting accused of "SPAMing" DDs. I believe nowadays the practice of
> > those mails are quite accepted, and the feedback you got seems to
> > confirm this.
>
> I "accept" the mails by deleting them unread. I know where the PTS is, I
> don't need to receive periodic mail reminders for my bugs, duplicated for
> each team mailing list I'm subscribed to.
>
> Sorry if my silence was taken for approval; it's actually spam fatigue and
> a recognition that there are better ways to use my time than fighting this
> battle.
You are aware that you can unsubscribe, right?
Anyway, I added vorlon@debian.org to the list of emails who have
unsubscribed.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: