[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Possible DDPOMail improvements?



On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:26:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry if my silence was taken for approval; it's actually spam fatigue and
> a recognition that there are better ways to use my time than fighting this
> battle.

My fault, I didn't meant to take your silence as approval. In this kind
of support systems which are clearly welcome by some and unwelcome by
others there are basically two choices: opt-in, and opt-out.

I believe in this case opt-out is fine, but if there are strong opinion
against that, I can easily set up a devotee-based poll to ask
developer's opinion. Please mail me in private if you think it is
needed. (My impression is that it is not needed: opt-out *seems* to me
to be fine for most of us.)

Lucas, BTW, you should probably add Sune to the exclusion list too :-)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: