Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about that more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and hope for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which actually means that, to a certain degree, those annoyed by cc:s could themselves do something about it.Mail-Followup-To is: A. Useless junk without clear semantics B. Violating standards C. Only supported by a handful of clients D. Obi-wan Kenobi says: “All of the above”http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt Perfectly well defined.
It wasa draft and the fourth line: Expires: May 1998 November 1997 I don't think it is perfectly defined. Anyway, the first rule of internet: "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others", so people should accept wrong CC:s without crying, and people should follow the CoC when sending mails. ciao cate