Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff? (was: Re: phyml_20081203-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> > If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about that
> > more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and hope
> > for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which actually means
> > that, to a certain degree, those annoyed by cc:s could themselves do something
> > about it.
> Mail-Followup-To is:
> A. Useless junk without clear semantics
> B. Violating standards
> C. Only supported by a handful of clients
> D. Obi-wan Kenobi says: “All of the above”
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
Perfectly well defined.
People who object to Mail-Followup-To even though it precisely addresses
this problem and would be perfectly suitable as a basis for standardization
are:
a) wankers
b) obstructionists
c) on Dick Cheney's payroll
d) profit
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Reply to: