Re: Results for General Resolution: Lenny and resolving DFSG violations
* Theodore Tso:
> I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
> If there was a GR which chainged the Debian Social contract which
> relaxed the first clause to only include __software__ running on the
> Host CPU, I would enthusiastically vote for such a measure.
I think it's not that simple anymore.
For instance, while I have no particular opinion on firmware, I object
to packages in main which, when run on a web browser, execute
or by linking them in some way).