Re: Intel Atom Processor

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Intel Atom Processor
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:27:12 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080723162712.GD6584@kodama.kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080722155803.GF30660@bee.dooz.org>
References: <[🔎] BAY107-W1817CD707E6E7BE7D2BA16BA8A0@phx.gbl> <20080722050647.GA26711@horacrux> <[🔎] BAY107-W17B7AB3AC32CF337C8C9D7BA850@phx.gbl> <3fa4029d0807220030r39d4b4fbi48fdf3779bebf571@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] BAY107-W7098A13B4A67083107A24BA850@phx.gbl> <[🔎] 20080722141754.GA21130@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20080722155803.GF30660@bee.dooz.org>

Loïc Minier wrote:
>  Would it be wrong to ship different flavors of the Debian CDs based on
>  various upstream software?

http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r3/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r3-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Intel Atom Processor
  - From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@hotmail.com>
- RE: Intel Atom Processor
  - From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@hotmail.com>
- RE: Intel Atom Processor
  - From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@hotmail.com>
- Re: Intel Atom Processor
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Intel Atom Processor
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea
Next by Date: Re: FHS and /var/www
Previous by thread: Re: Intel Atom Processor
Next by thread: Re: Intel Atom Processor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread