[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Incorrect use of dpkg conffile suffixes and lintian checks



On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:34:53PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Indeed, the XSF is carrying around tons of shell functions that are
> generally useful and so should go in to some sort of central package, but
> there's nowhere to put them. Getting something like this started has been
> on the backburner for me for a while. I'd happily contribute what we've got
> to such a package, or help start one up.

Yeah, but a point is: should we make the snippet in a package and then
have a dependencies on this? This is going to be suboptimal since some
of those snippets have to be called in preinst and pre-depends are not
nice ...

Alternatively, we can have a library of snippets shipped by debhelper
and a generic debhelper tool to expand snippets in maintainer scripts,
but this sounds ugly as well (or not?).

Or, we should have a dh_something for each purpose, but that will bloat
the dh_namespace.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: