On Nov 28, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform > > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading > > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own. No, not really. Providing inet-superserver means that a package supports the /usr/sbin/update-inetd API. > Where is that documented? Watching the progression of inetd packages in > Debian has been dizzying, I don't have the sense that there's any sort of > central plan that everyone's following. This virtual package's semantics I made one a long time ago, but people keep ignoring it. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature