[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xinetd is a viable inet-superserver

On Nov 28, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >   wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
> > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own.
No, not really. Providing inet-superserver means that a package supports
the /usr/sbin/update-inetd API.

> Where is that documented?  Watching the progression of inetd packages in
> Debian has been dizzying, I don't have the sense that there's any sort of
> central plan that everyone's following.  This virtual package's semantics
I made one a long time ago, but people keep ignoring it.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: