[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xinetd is a viable inet-superserver

Steve Greenland schrieb:
> On 28-Nov-07, 05:25 (CST), Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote: 
>> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
>>>   wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
>>> what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
>>> /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own.
>> I don't think this reasoning is correct. Take the existing
>> implementations of system-log-daemon/linux-kernel-log-daemon, like
>> rsyslog, syslog-ng or metalog. All use a different config file than
>> /etc/syslog.conf.
> The difference is that other packages don't manipulate log file
> configuration. 

Well, packages shouldn't manipulate the inetd.conf file directly anyway
but use the update-inetd interface.


Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: