Re: xinetd is a viable inet-superserver
On 28-Nov-07, 05:25 (CST), Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> > wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
> > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own.
> >
>
> I don't think this reasoning is correct. Take the existing
> implementations of system-log-daemon/linux-kernel-log-daemon, like
> rsyslog, syslog-ng or metalog. All use a different config file than
> /etc/syslog.conf.
The difference is that other packages don't manipulate log file
configuration.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
Reply to: