Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian
William Pitcock <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> As you don't seem to have understood at all, none of the xmms
>> alternatives are up to par with xmms, with many of them having
>> usability or stability problems.
> Please stop blaming the faults and defects of your packaging process on upstream
> developers. Audacious 1.3 is perfectly capable of replacing XMMS, and has done
> so in many other distributions already.
> Moreover, Adam Cecile has tried to get 1.3 into both Etch and now Lenny, and has
> so far been met with trouble doing so. You want your fixes? Guess what -- they
> are in 1.3. Perhaps all that is needed is for Audacious in Debian testing to
> actually reflect the current offering of upstream.
[07-08-12 - 11:52:13] julien@sonic(pts/2 300):~% dpkg -l audacious
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
ii audacious 1.3.2-4 Small and fast audio player which supports l
I propose you STFU and go fix your bugs.
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <email@example.com>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169