Le vendredi 13 juillet 2007 à 17:16 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > Oh my. Do you mean that in the 90 window managers shipped in Debian, > > none of them is suitable for all your needs and that you have to use > > *several* ones depending on the moment? > > Unix systems have supported selecting window managers on-the-fly for years > before Debian did it. Why does one extra entry for a submenu offend you so? I'm wondering what is the use case for that entry. > If a user submits a bug that requires a different wm to reproduce than the > one you normally use, isn't it nice to be able to switch wms for testing > without having to log out or start a second X session? I can imagine someone dealing with such a case (although I'd personally start a new session to better match the user's environment) but I don't think this justifies adding these entries to all users' menus. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=