Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
Hi,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Suggests is *way* weaker. The Needs would trigger automatic installation
> with any tool. Actually, if
> A->B (depends), B->C(depends), and C->B(Needs), then A won't be
> configured until both B and C are installed.
What stops us from using Recommends for that. The definition for
Recommends used to be "you may not install these, but you should have a
reason for it", which is exactly the foo/foo-data case.
Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>