Le dimanche 23 juillet 2006 à 01:07 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > Ian Jackson wrote: > > Didn't we already have the conversation where we explained that there > > is nothing necessarily wrong with a circular dependency ? > > Yes, and Bill continues to ignore it, as well as ignoring my > posts to his bug reports (such as #368481) asking for specifics of how > individual instances of dependency loops cause problems. Hasn't there been enough random bugs caused by circular dependencies? How many of them do you need before starting to fix your packages? Furthermore, there is no real justification for the circular dependency in debconf. Why don't you just fix it? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=