Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
Hi,
* Ian Jackson (ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk) [060726 13:18]:
> But, for example, foo <-Depends-> foo-data is not usually an example
> of a silly dependency.
Actually, there is no reason why foo-data needs foo configured before
being configured, but there might be reason for the other direction.
Why not inventing some new "Depends-for-being-useful" from foo-data to
foo, and having Depends cycle-free?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to:
- References:
- Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>