Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
* Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) [060726 14:49]:
> What about using Suggests instead of "Depends-for-being-useful"?
Suggests is *way* weaker. The Needs would trigger automatic installation
with any tool. Actually, if
A->B (depends), B->C(depends), and C->B(Needs), then A won't be
configured until both B and C are installed.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>