Re: libselinux1 - required
On 09/06/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:44:30 +1200, Nigel Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use
> > selinux,
> Where on earth did you get that idea? The goal is to make it
> _feasible_ for people to run SELinux on Etch by configuring boot
> > so couldn't it be easier to have a coreutils-selinux
> > package on the side?
> Since the original premise was flawed, this would just add to
> package bloat.
> > just like how the kernel team maintain a couple different branches
> > of the kernel at the same time. There are people that *REFUSE* to
> > use selinux (personal/political/etc... reasons), if "coreutils" is
> > made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then the user gets no
> > choice...
> Did you know that all Debian kernels now have SELinux compiled in?
Yeah, thankfully, I build my own kernels...
> > Personally, I am one of the above. Sadly however there is becoming
> > a lack of distributions that provide such a choice.
> Well, you can keep your box security free for as long as you want.
Yeah, as my computer is personal, I don't normally let anyone else use
it, these tools don't provide anything for me.
> I find you lack of faith in the forth dithturbing. Darse ("Darth")
> Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Personally, I agree with Thijs, if coreutils does not need
"libselinux1" to run (and other packages for that matter), they should
just be "recommends" or "suggests".
Blogging @ http://nigelj.blogspot.com
Proud Debian & FOSS User
Debian Maintainer of: html2ps & ipkungfu