Re: Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Another option would be to leave the source package maintainer the same (to
> retain proper credit, etc.), but override the binary package maintainer
> during the build (to reflect that it is a different build, and also display
> a more appropriate name in "apt-cache show" etc.).
> What do you think about this approach?
With proper changelog entries (as usual) should be fine as well.
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law