Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:42:10PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com> wrote:
> > There's no particular reason for Ubuntu developers to try and impose
> > Canonical's agenda on Debian; we have our own distro for (and because we
> > have) our own agenda.
>
> How could we know ? We know nothing about Ubuntu, nothing about
> Canonical, nothing about the goals, nothing about how everything was
> done to begin with, nothing about who works or doesn't work there.
Details about Ubuntu and its goals can be found on the website. In many
respects there is more information available about Ubuntu activity, and the
goals of the project, than about organizations which provide you with the
essentials of life. Yet, you seem to trust them by default, while you
assume that Ubuntu seeks to cause you harm. Why?
> Everything was done with the exact same secret used for this plan. And
> nobody cared enough to write up a proper announcement for Debian
> developers.
An announcement of what? The release meeting, or Ubuntu? You'd be wrong in
either case, as can be easily shown by mailing list archives.
> How are we supposed to trust you ? I certainly can't until this is
> fixed.
Fixed? You haven't identified a problem, and you seem to be attacking those
who are working to solve well-known problems in Debian.
--
- mdz
Reply to: